32 Summit Crescent vs 95 Summit Crescent
Data as of October 25, 2026 · updated every week
32 Summit Crescent is the older building (1956); 95 Summit Crescent was built in 1958. 32 Summit Crescent is assessed at $3,553,700, 33% more than 95 Summit Crescent ($2,662,800). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 32 Summit Crescent | 95 Summit Crescent | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Westmount | Westmount |
| Built | 1956 | 1958 |
| Assessed (roll) | $3,553,700 | $2,662,800 |
| Since the previous roll | +2 % | +2 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $51,416 | ≈ $38,053 |
| Lot | 731 m² | 479 m² |
| Floor area | 378 m² | 211 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 1 Note | 2 Note |
| Nearest metro | Villa-Maria, 1.3 km | Côte-Des-Neiges, 960 m |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 32 Summit Crescent Full report: 95 Summit Crescent