95 rue Park Ridge vs 96 rue Park Ridge
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
Both were built in 1970. 95 rue Park Ridge is assessed at $870,200, 18% more than 96 rue Park Ridge ($736,400). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 95 rue Park Ridge | 96 rue Park Ridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Kirkland | Kirkland |
| Built | 1970 | 1970 |
| Assessed (roll) | $870,200 | $736,400 |
| Since the previous roll | +11 % | +11 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $11,164 | ≈ $9,157 |
| Lot | 557 m² | 557 m² |
| Floor area | 230 m² | 113 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 2 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 95 rue Park Ridge Full report: 96 rue Park Ridge