135 rue Meaney vs 95 rue Meaney

Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week

95 rue Meaney is the older building (1988); 135 rue Meaney was built in 1993. 135 rue Meaney is assessed at $1,221,600, 24% more than 95 rue Meaney ($987,300). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.

135 rue Meaney95 rue Meaney
TypeHouse or buildingHouse or building
City and boroughKirklandKirkland
Built19931988
Assessed (roll)$1,221,600$987,300
Since the previous roll+2 %+2 %
Welcome tax on that value≈ $16,435≈ $12,920
Lot552 m²558 m²
Floor area355 m²246 m²
Notice of deteriorationNoNo
City’s right of first refusalNoNo
HeritageNoNo
In a flood zoneNoNo
Building permits on record00
Findings 2 Note 2 Note
Nearest metro——

The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.

Full report: 135 rue Meaney Full report: 95 rue Meaney

Compare other addresses