126 rue Meaney vs 139 rue Meaney

Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week

Both were built in 1988. 126 rue Meaney is assessed at $1,060,600, 4% more than 139 rue Meaney ($1,015,300). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.

126 rue Meaney139 rue Meaney
TypeHouse or buildingHouse or building
City and boroughKirklandKirkland
Built19881988
Assessed (roll)$1,060,600$1,015,300
Since the previous roll+2 %+2 %
Welcome tax on that value≈ $14,020≈ $13,340
Lot576 m²689 m²
Floor area254 m²241 m²
Notice of deteriorationNoNo
City’s right of first refusalNoNo
HeritageNoNo
In a flood zoneNoNo
Building permits on record00
Findings 2 Note 1 Note
Nearest metro——

The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.

Full report: 126 rue Meaney Full report: 139 rue Meaney

Compare other addresses