130 rue Meaney vs 165 rue Meaney

Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week

Both were built in 1988. 130 rue Meaney is assessed at $955,500, 16% more than 165 rue Meaney ($825,600). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.

130 rue Meaney165 rue Meaney
TypeHouse or buildingHouse or building
City and boroughKirklandKirkland
Built19881988
Assessed (roll)$955,500$825,600
Since the previous roll+2 %+2 %
Welcome tax on that value≈ $12,443≈ $10,495
Lot557 m²586 m²
Floor area236 m²198 m²
Notice of deteriorationNoNo
City’s right of first refusalNoNo
HeritageNoNo
In a flood zoneNoNo
Building permits on record00
Findings 2 Note 2 Note
Nearest metro——

The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.

Full report: 130 rue Meaney Full report: 165 rue Meaney

Compare other addresses