1620 crescent Newman vs 1635 crescent Newman
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
1620 crescent Newman is assessed at $13,857,800, 660% more than 1635 crescent Newman ($1,822,500). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 1620 crescent Newman | 1635 crescent Newman | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Dorval | Dorval |
| Built | — | 1980 |
| Assessed (roll) | $13,857,800 | $1,822,500 |
| Since the previous roll | +35 % | +35 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $205,978 | ≈ $25,448 |
| Lot | 20,966 m² | 5,254 m² |
| Floor area | — | 512 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 1 Note | 2 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 1620 crescent Newman Full report: 1635 crescent Newman