301 rue James Shaw vs 332 rue James Shaw
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
Both were built in 2001. 332 rue James Shaw is assessed at $2,479,600, 37% more than 301 rue James Shaw ($1,808,900). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 301 rue James Shaw | 332 rue James Shaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Beaconsfield | Beaconsfield |
| Built | 2001 | 2001 |
| Assessed (roll) | $1,808,900 | $2,479,600 |
| Since the previous roll | +12 % | +12 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $25,244 | ≈ $35,305 |
| Lot | 796 m² | 1,002 m² |
| Floor area | 354 m² | 425 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 1 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 301 rue James Shaw Full report: 332 rue James Shaw