61 Cedar Crescent vs 65 Cedar Crescent
Data as of October 25, 2026 · updated every week
Both were built in 1953. 61 Cedar Crescent is assessed at $2,050,900, 83% more than 65 Cedar Crescent ($1,121,000). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 61 Cedar Crescent | 65 Cedar Crescent | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Beaconsfield | Beaconsfield |
| Built | 1953 | 1953 |
| Assessed (roll) | $2,050,900 | $1,121,000 |
| Since the previous roll | +4 % | 0 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $28,874 | ≈ $14,926 |
| Lot | 844 m² | 844 m² |
| Floor area | 98 m² | 195 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 2 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 61 Cedar Crescent Full report: 65 Cedar Crescent