213 avenue Gilford vs 216 avenue Gilford
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
Both were built in 1967. 216 avenue Gilford is assessed at $1,045,100, 8% more than 213 avenue Gilford ($969,300). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 213 avenue Gilford | 216 avenue Gilford | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Beaconsfield | Beaconsfield |
| Built | 1967 | 1967 |
| Assessed (roll) | $969,300 | $1,045,100 |
| Since the previous roll | +2 % | +2 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $12,650 | ≈ $13,787 |
| Lot | 743 m² | 750 m² |
| Floor area | 236 m² | 287 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 2 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.
Full report: 213 avenue Gilford Full report: 216 avenue Gilford