265 avenue Elm vs 65 avenue Elm
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
65 avenue Elm is the older building (1982); 265 avenue Elm was built in 2010. 265 avenue Elm is assessed at $1,843,200, 363% more than 65 avenue Elm ($397,800). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 265 avenue Elm | 65 avenue Elm | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Beaconsfield | Beaconsfield |
| Built | 2010 | 1982 |
| Assessed (roll) | $1,843,200 | $397,800 |
| Since the previous roll | +20 % | +2 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $25,759 | ≈ $4,078 |
| Lot | 1,654 m² | 312 m² |
| Floor area | 496 m² | 119 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 1 Check 2 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.