165 Alton Drive vs 169 Alton Drive
Data as of October 29, 2026 · updated every week
Both were built in 1966. 165 Alton Drive is assessed at $845,700, 8% more than 169 Alton Drive ($786,000). Neither has a building permit on record. Neither is in a flood zone.
| 165 Alton Drive | 169 Alton Drive | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | House or building | House or building |
| City and borough | Beaconsfield | Beaconsfield |
| Built | 1966 | 1966 |
| Assessed (roll) | $845,700 | $786,000 |
| Since the previous roll | +2 % | +2 % |
| Welcome tax on that value | ≈ $10,796 | ≈ $9,901 |
| Lot | 658 m² | 658 m² |
| Floor area | 201 m² | 198 m² |
| Notice of deterioration | No | No |
| City’s right of first refusal | No | No |
| Heritage | No | No |
| In a flood zone | No | No |
| Building permits on record | 0 | 0 |
| Findings | 1 Note | 1 Note |
| Nearest metro | — | — |
The full report for each address explains every finding and shows the full permit and value history.